Accessibility

LibraryPress@UF promotes accessibility and works together to provide content in inclusive formats. This commitment is not just about following rules; it shows our responsibility to support knowledge and culture, ensuring everyone can enjoy the written word.

LibraryPress@UF Accessibility Statement

Accessibility is one of LibraryPress@UF’s (LP@UF) core values. In an increasingly digital world, particularly for presses with born-digital publications such as ours, it is paramount to provide our content accessibly to all readers. Accessibility is for everyone!

LP@UF is committed to providing an inclusive and accessible experience to everyone, including individuals with disabilities. LP@UF’s commitment is guided by our accessibility policy to ensure that people with disabilities have full and equal opportunity to access and benefit from the publications and resources offered by LP@UF through the University of Florida Digital Collections (UFDC), Florida Open Journals (Florida OJ), UF Pressbooks (https://ufl.pb.unizin.org/), and our LP@UF website go.ufl.edu/librarypress.

COMMITMENT

LP@UF has taken multiple steps to ensure the accessibility of our online experiences:

  • LP@UF strives to engage in interval audits, web page scans, and testing by professionals with disabilities to continually assess and improve the accessibility of go.ufl.edu/librarypress.
  • LP@UF further invests in training our digital team on accessibility to ensure our editors and designers are knowledgeable and follow best practices for accessibility.

Optimal Experience

  • Our publications strive to be compatible with common assistive technologies, including screen readers (e.g., Thorium, Calibre, JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver), speech recognition software, and alternative input devices.

WCAG defines four primary principles of accessibility:1

Perceivable: Information and user interface components must be presentable to users in ways they can perceive.

Operable: User interface components and navigation must be operable.

Understandable: Information and the operation of user interface must be understandable.

Robust: Content must be robust enough that it can be interpreted reliably by a wide variety of user agents, including assistive technologies.

Computer, telephone and letter with an arrow pointing towards a person with the word perceive. By the person there's a question mark with the word understand. From the person there's an arrow going back to the computer, telephone and letter with the word operate. In the middle is the word robust. https://accessibility.blog.gov.uk/2016/05/16/

Best Practices for Digital Publishing Accessibility

LibraryPress@UF understands that achieving accessibility involves finding a balance between structured guidelines and flexible, creative solutions. Our strategy combines checklists with user-friendly tools that are accessible to everyone, making it possible to ensure accessibility regardless of platform, publication type, or scale. A straightforward checklist can empower anyone, from students to faculty, to create more accessible digital publications. Since every book is unique, each one requires individual assessment and planning.  

Image preview of LibraryPress@UF's Publishing Accessibility Checklist, which is an editable Excel file. There are four main categories of accessibility requirements: images, headings, appearance, and color contrast.
LP@UF PUBLISHING PLATFORMS
Open Journal Systems (OJS)A widely used academic publishing platform that is improving accessibility features.
PressBooksAn open-source platform that generates EPUB3 and other accessible formats. 
Adobe InDesignGenerate accessible PDF / EPUB formats with proper tagging and metadata.
Finalized PDF from InDesign can by brought into Adobe Acrobat Pro to check accessibility and format a PDF/UA.

LP@UF utilizes SCALAR and WordPress for other digital publishing projects.

COLOR
TypeWCAG 2.2 AAWCAG 2.2 AAA
Normal text4.5:17:1
Large text*3:14.5:1
Incidental**NoneNone
Logotypes***NoneNone

* Large text is defined by WCAG as at least 18 point or 14 point bold or font size that would yield equivalent size for Chinese, Japanese and Korean (CJK) fonts.

** Incidental is defined by WCAG as text or images of text that are part of an inactive user interface component, that are pure decoration, that are not visible to anyone, or that are part of a picture that contains significant other visual content.

*** Logotype is defined by WCAG as text that is part of a logo or brand name.

Color Contrast Analyzer from the Paciello Group is a free program for Windows and Mac that includes an eyedropper tool that allows testing what you’re seeing on your screen instead of just relying on color codes. 

Avoid relying solely on color to convey meaning (use labels, patterns, or icons). 

ALTERNATIVE (ALT) TEXT

Alternative text, more commonly known as alt text, is a description that conveys the meaning of an image or visual component. It is used to make visual content accessible to folks with visual disabilities or for folks with low bandwidth who cannot support image display. Alt text should be provided for all images, unless decorative or the text is present elsewhere on the page. Use descriptive language and avoid using “image of…” at the start of your description.

Decorative images are defined as images used for aesthetic purposes, provide no information, and/or have no function beyond aesthetics.

PAGE STRUCTURE

Use appropriate heading levels in HTML when writing web content. Use descriptive titles and headings across your website. Heading levels should not be skipped in the ordering (e.g. <h1>, <h2>, <h3>) so that screen readers can correctly navigate through a page.

PKP also recommends creating journal documentation as static HTML pages rather than uploading PDFs for maximum accessibility.

DESCRIPTIVE LINKS

Creating descriptive links/URLs allows screen reader users to determine the purpose of a link and skip it if they are not interested in it. Link text needs to be:

  • Descriptive. URL text should be understood without additional context.
  • Concise. Use keywords.
  • Unique.
  • Visually distinct. URLs are usually underlined and in color. If you choose not to use the default blue, be sure to select a color with sufficient contrast.
EPUB

EPUB is becoming the standard e-book format for digital publishing. EPUB files provide an optimal reading experience on all devices, allowing users to adjust text size and layouts for personalization. They also support linked navigation, multimedia, and videos, and are up to 90% smaller than PDFs, leading to faster downloads and more efficient mobile data usage.3

EPUB Advantages:

  • Reflowable Text: EPUB files adjust to screen sizes and font preferences, providing a more personalized reading experience. 
  • Accessibility: EPUB is designed with accessibility in mind, ensuring better compatibility with screen readers and other assistive technologies. 
  • Interactive Elements: EPUB supports rich media elements like images, audio, and video, allowing for more engaging reading experiences. 
  • Lightweight: EPUB files are generally smaller in size than PDFs, making them easier to download and distribute. 
  • The main advantage of EPUB over HTML (HyperText Markup Language – fundamental building block of the web) is that they can be downloaded, shared, and accessed offline on various devices, including smartphones, tablets, e-readers, and desktops. EPUB files maintain important elements such as page numbers, headings, and columns, often missing in HTML pages.
PDF ACCESSIBILITY

PDFs are accessible when:4

  • Information can be read by an assistive device, such as screen readers. This means they need to be appropriately tagged.
  • There is a hierarchy of headings for clarity and understanding.
  • Lists, tables, and paragraphs are appropriately tagged and marked.
  • Important images have informative alt text and unimportant images/graphics have empty alt text.
  • Correct tab order for keyboard-only users.
  • Accurate metadata.

While PDFs are not considered fully accessible, there are ways to increase their accessibility.

  1. Ensure that your source document (whether Word, Google Doc, PowerPoint, InDesign, etc.) is as accessible as possible prior to converting to PDF.
  2. When converting your source document to PDF, use settings that retain tags and accessibility formatting. Avoid “Print to PDF.”
  3. Once you have created a PDF, check for the following:5
    • Tags. Open the Tags panel (View > Show/Hide > Navigation Panes > Tags) and make sure everything is appropriately tagged. The Autotag feature may be useful to start if you have none.
      • You will probably have heading tags (H1-H6), list tags (L, LI, LBody), paragraph tags (P), and link tags (Link).
    • Reading order. The order of the tags displayed in the Tags panel is called the Reading Order. Make sure the order of the tags matches the order of the content.
    • Alt text. Informative images should be tagged as <figure> and have useful alt text.
    • Color contrast.
    • File properties. Add and/or verify your PDF’s metadata, and be sure to double-check security settings.
  4. For additional needs and guidance, please check WCAG 2.2’s PDF techniques. This is up-to-date as of December 2024.

For additional guidance on other galley types supported by OJS, please visit PKP’s guidance on creating accessible galley files.

RESOURCES
TOOLS

* Most relevant to creating accessible PDFs for OJS

SUPPORT & FEEDBACK

  • If you need help with LP@UF publications or resources, or if you would like to provide feedback, please contact us at LibraryPress@uflib.ufl.edu.

FOOTNOTES

  1. W3C, “Introduction to Understanding WCAG 2.2: Understanding the Four Principles of Accessibility,” https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/intro#understanding-the-four-principles-of-accessibility ↩︎
  2. W3C, “WCAG 2.2, Success Criterion 1.4.1 Use of Color,” https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#use-of-color ↩︎
  3. ↩︎
  4. UCSF, “PDF Accessibility,” https://it.ucsf.edu/how-to/pdf-accessibility ↩︎
  5. Harvard, “Creating Accessible PDFs,” https://accessibility.huit.harvard.edu/pdf ↩︎

Enhancing Accessibility in Library Publishing: challenging, best practices, and sustainability

LPF 2025 LP@UF PRESENTATION, MAY 6, 2025 – By fostering dialogue and sharing experiences, this session aimed to build a collective understanding of what is achievable, spotlight gaps, and inspire actionable steps to advance accessibility in publishing practices. Participants leave with a clearer vision of shared challenges and innovations that can be adapted or developed to enhance accessibility in their own work environments.

css.php